288 days of hearings, 297 witnesses, 18,714 pages
At the Chelmsford private psychiatric hospital in Sydney, from 1963 to 1979, "deep sleep therapy" was practised: patients were held in a drug-induced coma for days, often with concurrent electroshock. Roughly 1,127 people received it.
By Letters Patent of 14 September 1988, the Governor of New South Wales established a Royal Commission under Supreme Court judge J. P. Slattery. The Commission sat in public for 288 days, examined 297 witnesses under compulsion, received 522 exhibits, produced 18,714 pages of transcript and reported in 15 volumes in December 1990.
What it found, according to the State Archives and Records Authority of New South Wales: no informed consent was obtained; patient records and death certificates were unlawfully falsified by doctors; controlled drugs were administered by nursing staff without lawful authority. The Commissioner described the treatment as unacceptable.
At least 24 patients died in connection with the treatment. Independent accounts give 23 to 27, depending on whether deaths during treatment, immediately afterwards, or after discharge are counted. Many survivors suffered permanent harm — infections, pneumonia, thromboses, fractures, long-term psychological damage. The number of those left permanently harmed was never quantified, and I am not going to invent one.
The treatment had been abandoned at Chelmsford by 1979, before any inquiry was constituted; the hospital continued to operate, renamed from 1980. It is now prohibited by section 83 of the Mental Health Act 2007 of New South Wales, along with insulin coma therapy and psychosurgery. The later proceedings against three doctors were disciplinary, began in 1991, were permanently stayed on grounds of procedural fairness and never led to a trial or a conviction.
Who brought it to light, and why I say so: from 1972 the nurse Rosa Nicholson documented irregularities and passed evidence to the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), which kept up the pressure for a decade. I state this explicitly because the distinction is the whole point of this page: the whistleblower is not the source of the proof. The findings were produced by a judge, under oath, with witnesses compelled to testify, and were lodged in the state archives. They would hold just the same had anyone else blown the whistle.
[39] State Archives and Records Authority of NSW, AGY-6764 · NRS-20949 (Royal Commission into Deep Sleep Therapy) · [40] Garton S. "Bailey, Harry Richard", Australian Dictionary of Biography, vol. 17 · [41] Walton M. Australas Psychiatry 2013;21(3):206–212 · [42] Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW), section 83 · [47] CCHR